0.04/0.12	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.04/0.13	% Command    : run_E %s %d THM
0.13/0.34	% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
0.13/0.34	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.13/0.34	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.13/0.34	% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
0.13/0.34	% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.13/0.34	% CPULimit   : 960
0.13/0.34	% WCLimit    : 120
0.13/0.34	% DateTime   : Tue Aug  9 04:30:57 EDT 2022
0.13/0.34	% CPUTime    : 
0.20/0.47	Running higher-order on 8 cores theorem proving
0.20/0.47	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=120 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
0.20/0.47	# Version: 3.0pre003-ho
0.20/0.48	# Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSMSSSNSSA.
0.20/0.48	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total)
0.20/0.48	# Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 600s (5) cores
0.20/0.48	# Starting ehoh_best_sine_rwall with 120s (1) cores
0.20/0.48	# Starting sh5l with 120s (1) cores
0.20/0.48	# Starting new_bool_3 with 120s (1) cores
0.20/0.48	# new_bool_3 with pid 7467 completed with status 0
0.20/0.48	# Result found by new_bool_3
0.20/0.48	# Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSMSSSNSSA.
0.20/0.48	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total)
0.20/0.48	# Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 600s (5) cores
0.20/0.48	# Starting ehoh_best_sine_rwall with 120s (1) cores
0.20/0.48	# Starting sh5l with 120s (1) cores
0.20/0.48	# Starting new_bool_3 with 120s (1) cores
0.20/0.48	# SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
0.20/0.48	# ...ProofStateSinE()=21/71
0.20/0.48	# Search class: HGUNF-FFSM00-SSSFFFBN
0.20/0.48	# partial match(1): HHUNF-FFSM00-SSSFFFBN
0.20/0.48	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 120 seconds (120 total)
0.20/0.48	# Starting new_ho_10 with 65s (1) cores
0.20/0.48	# new_ho_10 with pid 7468 completed with status 0
0.20/0.48	# Result found by new_ho_10
0.20/0.48	# Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSMSSSNSSA.
0.20/0.48	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total)
0.20/0.48	# Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 600s (5) cores
0.20/0.48	# Starting ehoh_best_sine_rwall with 120s (1) cores
0.20/0.48	# Starting sh5l with 120s (1) cores
0.20/0.48	# Starting new_bool_3 with 120s (1) cores
0.20/0.48	# SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
0.20/0.48	# ...ProofStateSinE()=21/71
0.20/0.48	# Search class: HGUNF-FFSM00-SSSFFFBN
0.20/0.48	# partial match(1): HHUNF-FFSM00-SSSFFFBN
0.20/0.48	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 120 seconds (120 total)
0.20/0.48	# Starting new_ho_10 with 65s (1) cores
0.20/0.48	# Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
0.20/0.48	# Presaturation interreduction done
0.20/0.48	
0.20/0.48	# Proof found!
0.20/0.48	# SZS status Theorem
0.20/0.48	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.20/0.48	thf(decl_22, type, attribute_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.20/0.48	thf(decl_23, type, domain_THFTYPE_IIiioIiioI: ($i > $i > $o) > $i > $i > $o).
0.20/0.48	thf(decl_24, type, domain_THFTYPE_IiiioI: $i > $i > $i > $o).
0.20/0.48	thf(decl_25, type, equal_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.20/0.48	thf(decl_26, type, holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI: $i > $o > $o).
0.20/0.48	thf(decl_27, type, instance_THFTYPE_IIiioIioI: ($i > $i > $o) > $i > $o).
0.20/0.48	thf(decl_28, type, instance_THFTYPE_IIiooIioI: ($i > $o > $o) > $i > $o).
0.20/0.48	thf(decl_29, type, instance_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o).
0.20/0.48	thf(decl_30, type, lAnna_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.20/0.48	thf(decl_31, type, lAsymmetricRelation_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.20/0.48	thf(decl_32, type, lBen_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.20/0.48	thf(decl_33, type, lBill_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.20/0.48	thf(decl_34, type, lBinaryPredicate_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.20/0.48	thf(decl_35, type, lBob_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.20/0.48	thf(decl_36, type, lMary_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.20/0.48	thf(decl_37, type, lOrganism_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.20/0.48	thf(decl_38, type, lSue_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.20/0.48	thf(decl_39, type, likes_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o).
0.20/0.48	thf(decl_40, type, n1_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.20/0.48	thf(decl_41, type, n2_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.20/0.48	thf(decl_42, type, parent_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o).
0.20/0.48	thf(decl_43, type, range_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o).
0.20/0.48	thf(decl_44, type, subclass_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o).
0.20/0.48	thf(decl_45, type, subrelation_THFTYPE_IIioIIioIoI: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o).
0.20/0.48	thf(decl_46, type, subrelation_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o).
0.20/0.48	thf(con, conjecture, ?[X14:$i > $i > $o, X15:$i > $i > $o, X16:$i]:(((((X15 @ X16 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)&(X14 @ X16 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i))&~(![X17:$i, X18:$i]:((X14 @ X17 @ X18))))&~(![X17:$i, X18:$i]:((X15 @ X17 @ X18))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', con)).
0.20/0.48	thf(ax_013, axiom, (parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', ax_013)).
0.20/0.48	thf(ax_003, axiom, ~((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lMary_THFTYPE_i)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', ax_003)).
0.20/0.48	thf(ax, axiom, (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', ax)).
0.20/0.48	thf(ax_026, axiom, ~((parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', ax_026)).
0.20/0.48	thf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ~(?[X14:$i > $i > $o, X15:$i > $i > $o, X16:$i]:(((((X15 @ X16 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)&(X14 @ X16 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i))&~(![X17:$i, X18:$i]:((X14 @ X17 @ X18))))&~(![X17:$i, X18:$i]:((X15 @ X17 @ X18)))))), inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[con])).
0.20/0.48	thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ![X35:$i > $i > $o, X36:$i > $i > $o, X37:$i, X38:$i, X39:$i, X40:$i, X41:$i]:((~(X36 @ X37 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)|~(X35 @ X37 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i)|(X35 @ X38 @ X39)|(X36 @ X40 @ X41))), inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])])).
0.20/0.48	thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ![X4:$i, X3:$i, X6:$i, X14:$i > $i > $o, X15:$i > $i > $o, X2:$i, X1:$i]:(((X15 @ X2 @ X3)|(X14 @ X4 @ X6)|~((X14 @ X1 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))|~((X15 @ X1 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])).
0.20/0.48	thf(c_0_8, plain, (parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax_013])).
0.20/0.48	thf(c_0_9, plain, ~(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lMary_THFTYPE_i), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ax_003])).
0.20/0.48	thf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i, X2:$i, X3:$i, X4:$i, X14:$i > $i > $o]:(((parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X1 @ X2)|(X14 @ X3 @ X4)|~((X14 @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7, c_0_8])).
0.20/0.48	thf(c_0_11, plain, (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax])).
0.20/0.48	thf(c_0_12, plain, ~(parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ax_026])).
0.20/0.48	thf(c_0_13, plain, ~((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lMary_THFTYPE_i)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])).
0.20/0.48	thf(c_0_14, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i, X2:$i, X3:$i, X4:$i]:(((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X1 @ X2)|(parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X3 @ X4))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10, c_0_11])).
0.20/0.48	thf(c_0_15, plain, ~((parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12])).
0.20/0.48	thf(c_0_16, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i, X2:$i]:((parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X1 @ X2)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13, c_0_14])).
0.20/0.48	thf(c_0_17, plain, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15, c_0_16])]), ['proof']).
0.20/0.48	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.20/0.48	# Parsed axioms                        : 71
0.20/0.48	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 50
0.20/0.48	# Initial clauses                      : 21
0.20/0.48	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
0.20/0.48	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 21
0.20/0.48	# Processed clauses                    : 35
0.20/0.48	# ...of these trivial                  : 7
0.20/0.48	# ...subsumed                          : 3
0.20/0.48	# ...remaining for further processing  : 25
0.20/0.48	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
0.20/0.48	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.20/0.48	# Backward-subsumed                    : 1
0.20/0.48	# Backward-rewritten                   : 7
0.20/0.48	# Generated clauses                    : 8
0.20/0.48	# ...of the previous two non-redundant : 7
0.20/0.48	# ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.20/0.48	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
0.20/0.48	# Paramodulations                      : 8
0.20/0.48	# Factorizations                       : 0
0.20/0.48	# NegExts                              : 0
0.20/0.48	# Equation resolutions                 : 0
0.20/0.48	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.20/0.48	#    Propositional check models        : 0
0.20/0.48	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.20/0.48	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.20/0.48	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.20/0.48	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.20/0.48	#    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.20/0.48	#    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.20/0.48	#    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.20/0.48	#    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.20/0.48	#    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.20/0.48	#    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.20/0.48	# Current number of processed clauses  : 6
0.20/0.48	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 4
0.20/0.48	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.20/0.48	#    Negative unit clauses             : 1
0.20/0.48	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 1
0.20/0.48	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 4
0.20/0.48	# ...number of literals in the above   : 14
0.20/0.48	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.20/0.48	# Current number of archived clauses   : 19
0.20/0.48	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 3
0.20/0.48	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3
0.20/0.48	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
0.20/0.48	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
0.20/0.48	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.20/0.48	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 8
0.20/0.48	# BW rewrite match successes           : 8
0.20/0.48	# Condensation attempts                : 35
0.20/0.48	# Condensation successes               : 0
0.20/0.48	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 1184
0.20/0.48	
0.20/0.48	# -------------------------------------------------
0.20/0.48	# User time                : 0.006 s
0.20/0.48	# System time              : 0.000 s
0.20/0.48	# Total time               : 0.006 s
0.20/0.48	# Maximum resident set size: 1804 pages
0.20/0.48	
0.20/0.48	# -------------------------------------------------
0.20/0.48	# User time                : 0.007 s
0.20/0.48	# System time              : 0.003 s
0.20/0.48	# Total time               : 0.010 s
0.20/0.48	# Maximum resident set size: 1784 pages
0.20/0.48	EOF